Post-Publication Discussion

Fostering Scholarly Dialogue in Jurnal Kanayagan
 

Jurnal Kanayagan is committed to advancing scholarly dialogue and welcomes constructive post-publication discussions. We provide a platform for readers to engage with, critique, and expand upon published research, ensuring that academic discourse continues even after an article has been officially released.

1. Submitting a Commentary

Readers who wish to comment on or critique a published article may submit their correspondence to the Editorial Office via our official email or communication channels. To be considered for review, comments must offer a substantive academic contribution, be highly relevant to the specific article, and be substantiated by solid scholarly evidence. Submissions must maintain a respectful and professional tone; ad hominem attacks, derogatory language, or defamatory remarks will not be tolerated and will result in immediate rejection.

2. Author's Right to Reply

To cultivate a balanced and robust academic discourse, the editorial board may invite the original authors to provide a constructive, evidence-based response to the reader's commentary. When deemed appropriate by the Editor-in-Chief, both the reader's critique and the corresponding author's rebuttal may be published together as an addendum, thereby enriching the formal scholarly record.

3. Corrections & Ethical Evaluation

Should a post-publication discussion bring to light significant errors, methodological omissions, or ethical breaches that compromise the integrity of an article, the Editorial Team will initiate a formal evaluation in strict accordance with Jurnal Kanayagan's publication ethics guidelines.

Based on the severity of the findings, the journal reserves the right to issue a Correction, an Expression of Concern, or a formal Retraction. Please note that while this discussion serves as an open academic forum, it does not supersede or replace the journal's formal investigative procedures for research misconduct.