Post-Publication Discussion
Jurnal SWARA highly values continuous academic discourse and invites readers to engage with our published content. We provide a platform for post-publication discussion to foster a dynamic, transparent, and constructive scholarly community.
1. Submission of Reader Comments
Readers wishing to discuss or critique a published article may submit their comments directly to the Editorial Office. All submissions must be strictly relevant to the article's academic content, substantiated by evidence or rigorous scholarly reasoning, and articulated in a professional, respectful tone. Defamatory language or personal attacks are strictly prohibited.
2. Author's Right of Reply
To ensure a balanced and fair academic debate, the original authors will be invited to review the critique and provide a formal, evidence-based response. Where appropriate, the journal may publish the reader's comment alongside the author's response within the official scholarly record.
3. Implications for Article Integrity
Should a post-publication discussion uncover significant verifiable errors, critical omissions, or ethical violations, the Editorial Team will initiate an evaluation under the journal's publication ethics framework. Depending on the severity of the findings, this may result in a formal Correction, an Expression of Concern, or an outright Retraction.
Note: This discussion process serves as a transparent academic forum and does not supersede Jurnal SWARA's formal protocols for investigating allegations of research misconduct. To initiate a discussion regarding a published article, please contact us at [email protected].